TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2002 (2) TMI 119
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....g, selling and supplying Rubber and for the purpose .of their business, are the importers of the product called 'Styrene Butadiene Rubber' (hereinafter referred to as the subject goods, for short) of 1500, 1700 and 1900 series, classified under Customs sub-heading No. 4002.19 of Customs Tariff Act. (ii) The respondent No. 1 is the Designated Authority. Respondent No. 2 is supposed to be one of the largest manufacturers of the subject goods in India. The respondent No. 3 is the Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue), who are entitled and have to issue the final Notification to finally impose the anti dumping duty, vide their notification. (iii) The petitioners, being the importers of the aforesaid subject goods from other countrie....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....9 of the Customs Tariff Act, originating and exported from the subject countries. (v) Being arrived by the aforesaid notification dated 2-6-1999, the petitioners, along with Automotive Tyre Manufacturers' Association (ATMA), who are also one of the importers of the subject goods, requested for a review of the anti dumping duty imposed on the import of the subject goods under Rule 23 of the Rules of 1995. The petitioners along with said ATMA requested for a review of the anti dumping duty imposed on the subject goods on the ground that there is only one manufacturer of the subject goods in India and that is the M/s. Synthetic & Chemical Ltd. Bareilly (Uttar Pradesh), the Respondent No. 2 herein. ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....n the said findings, the respondent No. 1, after taking into consideration the entire facts as mentioned therein, imposed anti dumping duties on all imports of all grades of Styrene Butadiene Rubber 1900 series. In the said finding, the respondent No. 1 mentioned the name of product under Series No. 1900 as High Styrene resin, master batch. However original name of the said product is Styrene Butadiene Rubber, is the allegation of the petitioner. The respondent No. 1, under Customs Tariff (Amendment) Act, 1995 and Rules of 1995, notified a final finding vide Notification No. 30/1/97-ADD, dated 2-6-1999 with regard to the subject goods originating in or exported from Japan, U.S.A., Taiwan, Turkey and Korea RP. 6.The petitioners say that b....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... imposition of the duty imposed by the Ministry of Commerce, the petitioner addressed a letter dated 26-9-2001, to the respondent No. 3, requesting the respondent No. 3 to issue its final notification, finally imposing the anti dumping duty on the subject goods. The petitioners allege that even after a specific request made by the petitioner to the respondent No. 3 to issue its final notification, the respondent No. 3 failed to do so. In the aforesaid circumstances, the petitioners have filed this petition, claiming the directions and calling upon the respondent No. 3 to issue final notification, in view of the notification issued by the respondent No. 1 and to finally notify imposition of anti dumping duty on the subject goods, imported fr....