2025 (9) TMI 248

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....rt under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act, 1961 questioning the interim order dated 01.04.2025 passed by the learned Single Judge in Writ Petition No.9586/2025 whereunder, direction is issued to the respondents therein as well as the concerned jail authorities to release the petitioner i.e., respondent herein on interim bail, pending disposal of the petition, subject to the condition stated therein. 2. Heard Sri. Aditya Vikram Bhat, learned AGA for the appellant and Sri. M. Arun Shyam, learned Senior counsel for Sri. Darshan R., learned counsel for respondent No. 1. Perused the entire writ appeal papers. 3. Learned AGA in addition to the grounds urged in the appeal memo would submit that the learned Single Judge could not hav....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....(Criminal) No.3736/2025, would have no application to the facts of the present case. 6. Learned Senior counsel while referring to the Hon'ble Apex Court order in Senior Intelligence Officer (Supra) would submit that the Hon'ble Apex Court without going into the merit or demerits of the case, has only on the ground that the interim bail was granted hurriedly has set aside the order with a direction to the respondent therein to surrender and to apply for regular bail. 7. Further, learned Senior counsel would invite attention of this Court to interim order dated 22.04.2025 passed in the instant appeal and would submit that respondent No. 1 co-operated with the Investigating Authority. Therefore, he also submits that there is no n....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ve the copies of the petition directing re-listing of the matter on 01.04.2025. On 01.04.2025, the impugned order is passed by the learned Single Judge against which, the present appeal is preferred. In the instant appeal on 22.04.2025, Co-ordinate Bench passed the following order: "Sri Jeevan J. Neeralagi, Stg. Counsel is requested to accept notice for Respondent No. 2. Heard the learned Senior State Counsel for the appellant and the learned Sr. Advocate appearing for respondents. Both the sides having argued the matter vociferously against each other for some time, now graciously agree with the suggestion of this Court that the first respondent-Mr. Mukund Agarwal shall make available himself to the appellant-aut....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....g is placed on record. 13. Furthermore, learned counsels appearing for the parties would submit that respondent No. 1 has complied with the conditions of interim bail and further learned Senior counsel for respondent No. 1 would submit that those conditions would bind respondent No. 1 during the pendency of the writ petition. 14. The correctness or otherwise of the arrest of respondent No. 1 is to be gone into and decided by the learned Single Judge. If the correctness or otherwise of the interim order of the learned Single Judge is answered in the present appeal, it may affect the contentions of the either parties before the learned Single Judge. Therefore, we have kept open all the contentions of the parties. 15. Learned AGA plac....