https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777759 Appellate interference with an interim custody order was unwarranted where the respondent had cooperated with the investigating authority and the purpose of custody for interrogation had substantially been achieved. The Court held that the correctness of the arrest and the merits of the pending writ petition concerning the GST enquiry were matters for the Single Judge, and appellate intervention at that stage could prejudice the parties' contentions. An earlier Supreme Court order was found inapplicable on the facts, and the existing interim arrangement was sufficient to protect the appellant's interests. The interim order directing release on interim bail was allowed to stand. en-us Wed, 06 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 04 Sep 2025 08:40:36 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777759 Appellate interference with an interim custody order was unwarranted where the respondent had cooperated with the investigating authority and the purpose of custody for interrogation had substantially been achieved. The Court held that the correctness of the arrest and the merits of the pending writ petition concerning the GST enquiry were matters for the Single Judge, and appellate intervention at that stage could prejudice the parties' contentions. An earlier Supreme Court order was found inapplicable on the facts, and the existing interim arrangement was sufficient to protect the appellant's interests. The interim order directing release on interim bail was allowed to stand. Case-Laws GST Wed, 06 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777759