2025 (8) TMI 264

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Mr. Goutham Shivshankar, AOR Ms. P. Ritika Rao, Adv For the Respondent : Ms. T. Archana, AOR Mr. Pai Amit, AOR Mr. Anish R. Shah, Adv ORDER 1. These Appeals arise from an interim order passed by the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (for short the "NCLAT"), New Delhi dated 23 July, 2020 in Company appeals (AT) Nos. 213 of 2017 and 296 of 2017, respectively, by which the two appeals ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ghts and obligations of contesting parties would be in the interest of justice. Similarly the status quo as made is only with a view to regulate the conduct of the company's affairs during the pendency of the case so that no contesting party takes an advantage during the period detrimental to the other party. The status quo restored as on 27.4.2017 (date of petition) as directed by the NCLT Chenna....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....is Court, vide order dated 19 February, 2021. 4. Mr. Ahmadi pointed out that during the pendency of the present appeals, the Contempt Petition No.19 of 2017 stood dismissed for default vide order dated 24.08.2022 passed by the NCLT Chennai. 5. According to him, it stood dismissed for default because petitioner in CP No. 19/2017, namely Cascade energy Private Limited respondent no.1 herein in....