<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (8) TMI 264 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776077</link>
    <description>The dispute concerned the Tribunal&#039;s power to pass an interim order, including a forensic audit, in allegations of siphoning of funds, breach of agreements and improper maintenance of books of account. No merits were examined because the underlying petition had already been dismissed for default due to non-appearance before the NCLT. As the main proceedings were no longer in existence, no further adjudication was considered necessary and the appeals were disposed of.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2025 07:54:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=840915" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (8) TMI 264 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776077</link>
      <description>The dispute concerned the Tribunal&#039;s power to pass an interim order, including a forensic audit, in allegations of siphoning of funds, breach of agreements and improper maintenance of books of account. No merits were examined because the underlying petition had already been dismissed for default due to non-appearance before the NCLT. As the main proceedings were no longer in existence, no further adjudication was considered necessary and the appeals were disposed of.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776077</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>