Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2025 (7) TMI 1078

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....P. No. 28892 & 28894 of 2022 - -<br>Service Tax<br>Hon&#39;ble Mr. Justice Krishnan Ramasamy For the Petitioner : Mr. M. Narasimha Bharathi For Mr. S. Muthuvenkatraman For the Respondents : Mr. B. Ramanakumar Senior Standing Counsel ORDER This Writ Petition has been filed challenging the impugned order dated 14.07.2022 passed by the 3rd respondent and for a direction to the 2nd respond....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... and penalty. 3. It is further submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that, the above scheme was extended upto 29.09.2020 for making the payment by virtue of the Notification dated 27.06.2020. The 3rd respondent, without considering the above fact, passed the impugned order dated 14.07.2022 demanding a sum of Rs.25,05,034/-. Hence, the learned counsel prays for appropriate directio....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....er paid the entire arrears amount on 30.06.2020. The 3rd respondent, without taking into consideration the extension of above scheme, passed the impugned order dated 14.07.2022 demanding a sum of Rs.25,05,034/-. Therefore, this Court is of the view that, the impugned order was passed, without any application of mind and hence, it is liable to be set aside. 7. Accordingly, the impugned order dat....