1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Taxpayer wins discharge certificate after timely payment under SVLDRS scheme despite department's additional demand</h1> The Madras HC allowed a petition seeking issuance of Form SVLDRS-4 discharge certificate. The petitioner had paid Rs.16,70,022.40 under the SVLDRS scheme ... Seeking appropriate direction to issue Form SVLDRS-4 (discharge certificate) to discharge the liability of the petitioner - non-application of mind while passing impugned order - violation of principles of natural justice - HELD THAT:- In the present case, there is no dispute with regard to the payment of Rs.16,70,022.40/- made by the petitioner. The last date which was specified in the notice for making the above payment under SVLDRS scheme is on or before 30.06.2020. The SVLDRS scheme was subsequently extended upto 29.09.2020 to avail the benefit under the scheme. The petitioner paid the entire arrears amount on 30.06.2020. The 3rd respondent, without taking into consideration the extension of above scheme, passed the impugned order dated 14.07.2022 demanding a sum of Rs.25,05,034/-. Therefore, this Court is of the view that, the impugned order was passed, without any application of mind and hence, it is liable to be set aside. The impugned order dated 14.07.2022 passed by the 3rd respondent is set aside. Consequently, the respondents are directed to issue Form SVLDRS-4 to discharge the tax liability of the petitioner for the period from 2014-15 to 2017-18 (Up to June 2017) in terms of the provisions of the scheme, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order - Petition allowed. The Madras High Court, through Justice Krishnan Ramasamy, allowed the writ petition challenging the impugned order dated 14.07.2022 passed by the 3rd respondent. The petitioner had paid the entire arrears of Rs.16,70,022.40 under the SVLDRS scheme on or before 30.06.2020, as demanded in Form SVLDRS-3. Although the scheme was extended up to 29.09.2020 by Notification dated 27.06.2020, the 3rd respondent ignored this extension and issued the impugned order demanding Rs.25,05,034/- towards interest and penalty. The Court held that the impugned order was passed 'without any application of mind' and therefore liable to be set aside. The respondents were directed to issue Form SVLDRS-4 (discharge certificate) to discharge the petitioner's tax liability for the period 2014-15 to 2017-18 (up to June 2017) in accordance with the scheme, within four weeks. The writ petition was allowed with no costs.