TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
Transformation of Tribunal Administration in Indian Tax Law : Clause 361(1), (3) to (5) of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs. Income Tax Bill, 2025 and the Income-tax Act, 1961
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....nance of the ITAT, superseding the existing regime set out in Section 252 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. This commentary examines Clause 361 in detail, elucidates its objectives, analyzes its provisions, and compares them with the existing statutory framework u/s 252. The analysis also addresses the practical implications, policy considerations, and areas that may require further clarification or reform. Objective and Purpose The legislative intent behind Clause 361 is to update and harmonize the constitution and governance of the ITAT in light of recent reforms in tribunal administration, particularly the Tribunals Reforms Act, 2021, and the Finance Act, 2017. The purpose is twofold: * To ensure that the ITAT is constituted and fun....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....lability based on caseload and administrative exigencies. The clause does not specify a minimum or maximum number, which could be both a strength (flexibility) and a weakness (potential for executive overreach). * Appointment of the President (Sub-section 3) Clause 361(3) provides that the Central Government shall appoint as President: * (a) A sitting or retired Judge of a High Court who has completed at least seven years of service as a High Court Judge; or * (b) One of the Vice-Presidents of the Appellate Tribunal. Interpretation: This provision elevates the status of the President by requiring significant judicial experience, thus reinforcing the judicial character of the Tribunal. The alternative of appointing a Vice-President....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....or judicial and accountant members, respectively, detailing minimum years of experience and alternative eligibility criteria (e.g., service in the Indian Legal Service, advocacy, accountancy practice, or as an Income Tax Service officer). Clause 361 omits these specifics, instead deferring to the Tribunals Reforms Act, 2021, for appointments post-2021. Implication: The shift to the Tribunals Reforms Act as the governing statute for qualifications and service conditions reflects a move towards uniformity across tribunals, but may reduce the visibility of specific eligibility criteria within the Income Tax legislation itself. * Transitional Provisions * Section 252 does not contain an explicit transitional provision regarding the servic....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ction 252(2) and (2A), instead referring to the Tribunals Reforms Act, 2021. This is a significant shift, as it centralizes the appointment process under a general law applicable to all tribunals, rather than retaining bespoke provisions for the ITAT. * Section 252 contains explanations for computing periods of service for eligibility, which are absent in Clause 361. Implication: While this promotes uniformity and potentially higher standards, it may also reduce the specificity and sectoral tailoring of eligibility requirements for ITAT members. Practical Implications * For Existing Members: The transitional provision in Clause 361(2)(b) ensures that members appointed prior to the relevant cut-off date continue under the old regime, ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....cutive Discretion: The broad discretion given to the Central Government in determining the number of members and appointments, without mandatory consultation with the judiciary or an independent commission, may raise concerns about independence unless adequately safeguarded by the Tribunals Reforms Act. Policy Considerations and Historical Background The evolution from Section 252 to Clause 361 reflects a broader policy shift towards standardization and judicialization of tribunal administration. The Supreme Court, in several landmark decisions (e.g., Madras Bar Association cases), has repeatedly underscored the need for judicial independence, parity with the higher judiciary, and protection against arbitrary removal. The Tribunals Reform....