2025 (6) TMI 1714
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....r. Justice Krishnan Ramasamy For the Petitioner : M/s. G.R. Associates For the Respondents : Dr. B. Ramaswamy Senior Standing Counsel ORDER The challenge in this Writ Petition is to the order dated 28.03.2022 passed by the 2nd respondent and to quash the same and consequently direct the respondents to consider the replies given by the petitioner dated 06/12/2021, 21/03/2022, 23/03/2022....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....by the petitioner was not recorded. He therefore prays to set aside the same. 4. The learned Senior Standing Counsel for the respondents would submit that despite sufficient opportunities being granted to the petitioner, the petitioner failed to submit his reply. Howerver, he fairly submitted that one more opportunity may be given to the petitioner to substantiate its case. 5. Heard both sid....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....f personal hearing to the petitioner otherwise, it will amount to depriving the interest of the petitioner and the same amounts to violation of principles of natural justice. 7. In the case on hand, the impugned order was passed without taking notice of the replies filed by the petitioner and also without giving an opportunity of personal hearing to the Petitioner and therefore the same is liab....


TaxTMI