https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773601 The HC quashed a tax demand order passed under CGST Act, 2017, finding that authorities incorrectly stated petitioner filed no reply despite documentary evidence of multiple submissions on various dates in 2021-2022. The Court held the order violated Section 75(4) of CGST Act and principles of natural justice by failing to consider petitioner's replies and not providing mandatory personal hearing opportunity. The matter was remanded with directions to reactivate departmental portal, allow fresh reply filing, issue proper hearing notice, and pass orders within stipulated timeframe after due consideration. en-us Mon, 09 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 25 Jun 2025 09:23:44 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773601 The HC quashed a tax demand order passed under CGST Act, 2017, finding that authorities incorrectly stated petitioner filed no reply despite documentary evidence of multiple submissions on various dates in 2021-2022. The Court held the order violated Section 75(4) of CGST Act and principles of natural justice by failing to consider petitioner's replies and not providing mandatory personal hearing opportunity. The matter was remanded with directions to reactivate departmental portal, allow fresh reply filing, issue proper hearing notice, and pass orders within stipulated timeframe after due consideration. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 09 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773601