Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1995 (6) TMI 18

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....s. Universal Products had imported from Singapore a consignment of timber load in the month of October 1986. The Petitioners claim to have purchased the consignment on "High-Seas" basis. On November 5, 1986, the Customs House Agent of the Petitioners prepared a Bill of Entry for home consumption and tendered the same in the Customs office. It is the claim of the Petitioners that the Bill of Entry ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....6 and the claim of the department that it was presented on November 5, 1986 is not correct. The learned Counsel urged that the Bill of Entry was returned as it was not in proper form and therefore, there was no presentation. The contention is devoid of any merit. On behalf of the Respondents, Mr. Shah has produced the original Cargo Declaration Form and perusal of the same leaves no manner of doub....