Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the rate of customs duty was to be determined by the date on which the Bill of Entry was first presented, or by the later date on which the corrected Bill of Entry was represented.
Analysis: The original cargo declaration and register entries showed that the Bill of Entry had in fact been presented and registered on the earlier date, after which it was returned for correction and later re-presented. In customs law, the relevant date for determining duty is the date of presentation of the Bill of Entry, and a return for correction does not shift that date to the date of re-presentation.
Conclusion: The later date of re-presentation did not govern the duty payable. The claim for assessment at the earlier duty rate was rejected, and the issue was decided against the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: For customs assessment, the rate of duty is fixed with reference to the date of first presentation of the Bill of Entry, and correction followed by re-presentation does not alter that relevant date.