2025 (1) TMI 1423

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e Respondent Nos. 1 to 3: Adv. Karan Adik & Adv. Abhishek Mishra. P.C. 1. The above Writ Petition is filed seeking a writ, order or direction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking to quash the impugned show cause notice dated 11th July, 2024 (Exhibit "A") issued under Section 74 of the Central Goods and Service Tax, 2017 (for short "CGST Act"). The interim relief sought is ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....urden the record of this Court. He submitted that the present Writ Petition is nothing but a chance litigation and deserves to be dismissed with heavy costs. 3. We have heard Mr. Sridharan, learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner as well as the learned Advocate appearing on behalf of the Respondents. The principle ground of challenge to the show cause notice is the fact tha....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....rnataka High Court has also issued a stay on the operation of the show cause notice. The grievance in the present matter is that the show cause notice issued by Respondent No.2 herein, is now inter alia seeking to bring to tax a part of the amount of Rs. 6092 Crores, and which is already brought to tax in its entirety in Karnataka. The submission of the Petitioner, therefore, is that the Petitione....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....is concerned, we do not find any merit. Prima facie, after going through the Petition, we find that the Maharashtra Authorities as well as the Karnataka Authorities are seeking to tax the Petitioner on the very same transaction. The Karnataka Authorities have in fact brought the entire amount of Rs. 6092 Crores to tax. The Maharashtra Authorities are now seeking to bring a part of that considerati....