<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (1) TMI 1423 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765358</link>
    <description>HC finds writ petition maintainable challenging tax notice under CGST Act. Court recognized potential double taxation by Maharashtra and Karnataka authorities on same transaction. Granted interim relief by restraining respondents from proceeding with show cause notice, while allowing parties to seek order vacation based on pending Karnataka proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2025 10:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=793231" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (1) TMI 1423 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765358</link>
      <description>HC finds writ petition maintainable challenging tax notice under CGST Act. Court recognized potential double taxation by Maharashtra and Karnataka authorities on same transaction. Granted interim relief by restraining respondents from proceeding with show cause notice, while allowing parties to seek order vacation based on pending Karnataka proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765358</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>