Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Feedback/Report an Error
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

2012 (7) TMI 1173

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....spondent(s) : 1 - 3. MS Dharmishta Raval for Respondent(s) : 1, MR Nilesh M Shah for Respondent(s) : 2, 4, MR YN Ravani for Respondent(s) : 3, ORDER 1. Heard Mr. Sunit Shah, learned counsel with Mr. N.V. Gandhi, learned advocate for the petitioner and Ms. Dharmishta Raval, learned advocate for respondent No.1, Securities Exchange Board of India ('SEBI' for short), Mr. Kavina, learned ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nt no.3-Bank of Baroda to not debit the petitioner's Over Draft Account with any further interest; 7(d) declare that the respondent no.3-Bank of Baroda was not supposed to charge any interest on Rs. 1,89,000/= in view of the withdrawal of the application by the petitioner; and accordingly the respondent no.3-Bank of Baroda shall give effect into the account;" 3. The respondents have filed t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....t the petitioner has already filed an application-complaint dated 25.6.2011 before the respondent No.1. 6. The petitioner is relegated to the respondent No.1 being the competent authority under provisions of the Act to decide the controversy raised by the petitioner. 7. Therefore, present petition is disposed of with below mentioned observations. 8. Respondent No.1 will take into consideration ....