2012 (7) TMI 1173

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....for Petitioner(s): 1 Notice Served for Respondent(s) : 1 - 3. MS Dharmishta Raval for Respondent(s) : 1, MR Nilesh M Shah for Respondent(s) : 2, 4, MR YN Ravani for Respondent(s) : 3, ORDER 1. Heard Mr.  Sunit Shah, learned counsel with Mr. N.V. Gandhi, learned advocate for the petitioner and Ms. Dharmishta Raval, learned advocate for respondent No.1, Securities Exchange Boa....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....iate in the facts and circumstances of the case; 7(c) direct the respondent no.3-Bank of Baroda to not debit the petitioner's Over Draft Account with any further interest; 7(d) declare that the respondent no.3-Bank of Baroda was not supposed to charge any interest on Rs. 1,89,000/= in view of the withdrawal of the application by the petitioner; and accordingly the respondent ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....etitioner, present petition does not deserve to be entertained, more so in view of the fact that the petitioner has already filed an application-complaint dated 25.6.2011 before the respondent No.1. 6. The petitioner is relegated to the respondent No.1 being the competent authority under provisions of the Act to decide the controversy raised by the petitioner. 7. Therefore, present petition ....