https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459325 The Gujarat HC declined to entertain a writ petition where the dispute fell within SEBI's statutory adjudicatory powers under the SEBI Act, regulations and circulars, and the petitioner had already invoked the complaint mechanism before SEBI. As a complete alternative-remedy hierarchy was available, the Court relegated the petitioner to the statutory forum and left the merits undecided. It also directed SEBI to consider the pending complaint after hearing the parties and to decide it expeditiously, preferably within four months, while preserving the petitioner's right to pursue further remedies under the Act if aggrieved. en-us Wed, 18 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 09 Dec 2024 18:08:37 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459325 The Gujarat HC declined to entertain a writ petition where the dispute fell within SEBI's statutory adjudicatory powers under the SEBI Act, regulations and circulars, and the petitioner had already invoked the complaint mechanism before SEBI. As a complete alternative-remedy hierarchy was available, the Court relegated the petitioner to the statutory forum and left the merits undecided. It also directed SEBI to consider the pending complaint after hearing the parties and to decide it expeditiously, preferably within four months, while preserving the petitioner's right to pursue further remedies under the Act if aggrieved. Case-Laws SEBI Wed, 18 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459325