2024 (12) TMI 63
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....RIM APPLICATION (L) NO. 6942 OF 2021 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 2392 OF 2017 - -<br>GST<br>M.S. SONAK & JITENDRA JAIN, JJ. For the Petitioner/Applicant: Mr Vikram Nankani, Senior Advocate, with Stella Joseph, Rushil Shah & Hema Modi, i/b, Economic Laws Paractice,. For the Respondent Nos. 2 & 4: Mr Priyanshu Doshi, with Ruju Thakkar,. For the Respondent No. 3: Ms P S Cardozo,. 1. Heard Mr Nan....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....pugned notifications are not directly before us. In such matters, rather than entertain an omnibus Petition on behalf of the association, it is appropriate that any individual members of the Petitioner who may be affected by the impugned notifications are permitted to challenge such notifications or actions based on such notifications. Such matters might involve the examination of facts peculiar t....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ities to dispose of notices issued to the Petitioner's members by considering this Court's order in Tata Motors Ltd (supra) and the Hon'ble Supreme Court's order in Mohit Minerals Pvt Ltd (supra). 6. According to us, the suggestion made by Mr Nankani is fair and reasonable in the circumstances of the case. Even otherwise, the adjudicating authorities, while disposing of the notices issued, are ....
TaxTMI