2018 (6) TMI 1858
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....For the Respondent : None. JUDGMENT PER Dr. VINEET KOTHARI J. Mr. Jeevan J. Neeralgi, Adv. for Appellant-Revenue Mr. Jeevan J. Neeralgi, learned counsel for the appellant-Revenue submits that the present appeal may be dismissed as this case is covered by the decision of this Court passed on 13.06.2018 in C.E.A. Nos. 43/2015 & 35-36/2016 & Connected matters (COMMISSIONER OF SERVICE TAX & A....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....lar remand order by the learned Tribunal, a Division Bench of this Court in the case of Principal Commissioner of S.T., Bangalore V/s. Broadcom India Research Pvt. Ltd., [2016 [43] S.T.R. 321 [Kar.]], has held that in these circumstances, no substantial question of law arises for consideration by this Court and therefore the appeal filed by the Revenue was dismissed. The relevant paragraphs 6 and ....
TaxTMI