https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458546 A Tribunal remand directing factual examination of the nexus between input service and output service was held to be a proper exercise of discretion, and not perverse, so no substantial question of law arose. Applying an earlier coordinate Bench approach to similar remand orders, the Karnataka HC found the Revenue's challenge on the same footing and declined interference. The appeal was dismissed. en-us Wed, 20 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 05 Nov 2024 19:48:52 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458546 A Tribunal remand directing factual examination of the nexus between input service and output service was held to be a proper exercise of discretion, and not perverse, so no substantial question of law arose. Applying an earlier coordinate Bench approach to similar remand orders, the Karnataka HC found the Revenue's challenge on the same footing and declined interference. The appeal was dismissed. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 20 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458546