2024 (11) TMI 53
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... Kumar, Superintendent (AR) appeared for the Respondent ORDER The issue involved in the present case is that whether the appellant is eligible for waiver of penalty imposed under Rule 26 in case where, the main case of Komal Atomizer P Ltd. vide final order No. A/11362/2021 dated 01.04.2021 against whom the duty demand was confirmed, has been settled under SVLDRS-2019. 2. Shri Mrugesh Pan....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....5) TMI 858-CESTAT Mumbai. • Mr. Dinesh Kanoria Versus Commissioner of Central Excise, Thane-1-2022 (12) TMI 1408-CESTAT Mumbai. • P.B. Vyas and Ors Versus Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai-III - 2021 (3) TMI 1305-CESTAT Mumbai. • Shri Sasthi Charan Banerjee Versus Commissioner of CGST & CX, Bolpur Commissionerate,- 2022 (12) TMI 1437-CESTAT Kolkata. ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... Ronak Chaudhari Vs. C.C.E. & ST Surat-I vide final order No. A/12576/2021 dated 02.12.2021 CESTAT Ahmedabad • M/s Four R Associates & Ors Vs Commissioner of GST & Central Excise Chennai South Commissionerate- 2023 (11) TMI 9 CESTAT Chennai 4. On careful consideration of the submission made by both the sides and perusal of record, I find that though there are contrary judgment on t....
TaxTMI