Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether penalty imposed on a co-noticee under Rule 26 was liable to be set aside when the main noticee's dispute had been settled under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019.
Analysis: The issue was decided in the light of conflicting decisions on waiver of penalty for co-noticees after settlement of the main case under SVLDRS-2019. It was held that the Division Bench view, which was in favour of the assessee, would prevail over contrary Single Member Bench decisions. On that basis, the penalty imposed on the appellant could not be sustained.
Conclusion: The penalty under Rule 26 was set aside and the appeal was allowed in favour of the appellant.