Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether penalty imposed on a co-noticee survives after the main noticee settles the dispute under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019.
Analysis: The main noticee had already obtained a discharge certificate under the Scheme in full and final settlement of the tax dues. In such circumstances, the continued insistence on penalty from the accountant, who was only a co-noticee, would frustrate the object of the Scheme. The Tribunal followed its earlier view that once the principal dispute is settled under the Scheme, the corresponding penalty demand against the co-noticee does not survive.
Conclusion: The penalty imposed on the co-noticee was set aside and the appeal was allowed.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the principal noticee has settled the dispute and obtained discharge under the Scheme, penalty proceedings against a co-noticee for the same matter do not survive.