Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether penalty could survive against the director after the main dispute had been settled under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme Rules, 2019 and the relief contemplated under the scheme covered the present appellant.
Analysis: The main noticee had already settled the dispute under the scheme and obtained the discharge certificate with nil tax liability. The appellant's conduct was only attributed with general negligence, without specific direct involvement warranting penalty. In view of the scheme benefits, the relief contemplated under Section 124(1)(b) of the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme Rules, 2019, the Board Circular, and the Tribunal's consistent view in similar matters, no penalty was sustainable against the present appellant.
Conclusion: The penalty imposed on the appellant was set aside and the appeal was allowed.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the underlying dispute is settled under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme Rules, 2019 and the case falls within the scheme's relief structure, a penalty cannot be sustained against the appellant for the same settled matter.