2024 (10) TMI 619

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Mr. Pullela Nageswara Rao , Member ( Technical ) Ms. Roopa KK , Mr. Sathish Giri. R , Advocates Appeared for Appellant Mr.K. Viswanath , Authorized Representative for Respondent ORDER Per : P. A. Augustian The issue in the present appeal is whether the penalty imposed on co-noticee can be sustained, in case the main appellant has opted for settling the issue under SVLDRS. 2. The....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nsidered and dismissed. The Learned Counsel for the appellant also produced the connected documents. 4. Learned Counsel further submits that the issue whether the proceedings against the co-noticee can be proceeded, when the penalty imposed on the co-noticee alone is under challenge before the Tribunal is settled by various decisions including the decision of this Tribunal in the matter of Shri....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e Tribunal vide Order No.20090/2024 dated 09.02.2024. He has further submitted that since the main appeal has been settled under SVLDRS, 2019, penalty imposed on the appellants under the same Order-in-Original cannot be sustained in view of the judgment of this Tribunal in the case of Shri Raghavendra, Plant Manager Vs. CC, Mysore [Final Order No.20432/2024 dated 22.05.2024]. 4. I find th....