2024 (10) TMI 618

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... us. 2. The facts which led to the issue of the impugned order are that in the course of audit of M/s Raipur Forging Pvt. Ltd., it was found that they had purchased capital goods worth Rs. 1,61,46,428/- from M/s Ajmera Steels Pvt. Ltd. which were originally removed from the premises of M/s Stainless India Ltd. [Respondent] Based on this information, the Superintendent of Central Excise, Range - III, Jodhpur, by letter dated 19.11.2015 requested the respondent to pay an amount under Rule 3 (5A) (ii) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 [CCR] as the amount to be paid if capital goods on which CENVAT credit is taken are removed from the factory. Respondent did not respond and therefore, a show cause notice dated 18.04.2017 was issued to the respond....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....y the percentage points calculated by straight line method as specified below for each quarter of a year or part thereof from the date of taking the CENVAT Credit, namely :- (i) for computers and computer peripherals : for each quarter in the first year @ 10% for each quarter in the second year @ 8% for each quarter in the third year @ 5% for each quarter in the fourth and fifth year @ 1% (ii) for capital goods, other than computers and computer peripherals @ 2.5% for each quarter : Provided that if the amount so calculated is less than the amount equal to the duty leviable on transaction value, the amount to be paid shall be equal to the duty leviable on transaction value. ....