Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1977 (10) TMI 36

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....erred by the Appellate Tribunal to this court for our opinion in relation to the assessment years 1967-68, 1968-69 and 1969-70 reads as follows : " Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, it has been rightly held that the insurance premia paid by the assessee could not constitute gift ? " The assessee had taken two policies of insurance on his life, one for a lakh of rupe....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....d for our opinion turns on the question whether the view taken by the Tribunal that the assessee's contention is well-founded is correct or not. We agree with the view taken by the Appellate Tribunal. Though the wife is the nominee under the policy and so the person entitled ultimately to receive the benefit of the policy in the event of death or on its maturity, the obligation to pay the insur....