<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1977 (10) TMI 36 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38491</link>
    <description>Premiums paid by an assessee on his own life insurance policies were not treated as a gift for gift-tax purposes because the payments merely discharged his contractual obligation under the policies. Although the wife was the nominee and could receive benefits on death or maturity, there was no immediate transfer of property from the assessee to the nominee. As a gift requires such an immediate transfer, the premium payments fell outside the scope of gift-tax.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2010 16:53:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=77037" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1977 (10) TMI 36 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38491</link>
      <description>Premiums paid by an assessee on his own life insurance policies were not treated as a gift for gift-tax purposes because the payments merely discharged his contractual obligation under the policies. Although the wife was the nominee and could receive benefits on death or maturity, there was no immediate transfer of property from the assessee to the nominee. As a gift requires such an immediate transfer, the premium payments fell outside the scope of gift-tax.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38491</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>