2019 (3) TMI 2066

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nderpal For the Respondent : Mr. Madhur Agrawal a/w Mr. Rajesh Poojary i/b Mint & Conferers ORDER P.C.: 1. This Appeal is filed by the Revenue challenging the Judgment of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. The following question has been presented for our consideration: "Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Hon'ble ITAT has erred in excludi....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....al relied upon and referred to the decision of this Court in the case of CIT Vs. Sudershan Chemicals Industries Limited 245 ITR 769 and on the decision of Uttarakhand High Court in the case of Director of Income tax, International Taxation, Delhi II Vs. Schlumberger Asia Services Ltd. 317 ITR 156 and held that service tax component cannot form part of the Assessee's income. 3. Learned Couns....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....P.) Ltd. (supra). In the considered view of the Court, the decision of the Supreme Court in Lakshmi Machines Works (supra) is sufficient to answer the question framed in the present appeal in favour of the Assessee. The service tax collected by the Assessee does not have any element of income and therefore cannot form part of the gross receipts for the purposes of computing the 'presumptive in....