<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 2066 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457352</link>
    <description>The Bombay HC dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming that service tax should not be included in the Assessee&#039;s income for computing presumptive profit under Section 44BB of the Income Tax Act, 1962. The court upheld the ITAT&#039;s decision, aligning with previous rulings, that service tax is collected on behalf of the government and does not constitute income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Sep 2024 20:36:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=768625" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 2066 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457352</link>
      <description>The Bombay HC dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming that service tax should not be included in the Assessee&#039;s income for computing presumptive profit under Section 44BB of the Income Tax Act, 1962. The court upheld the ITAT&#039;s decision, aligning with previous rulings, that service tax is collected on behalf of the government and does not constitute income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457352</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>