2004 (8) TMI 776

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....lly as follows: On 20.11.2000 one Hanumant Vithal Choudhary (hereinafter referred to as the 'deceased') met homicidal death due to attack by several persons. The law was set into motion against six persons including the respondents. Though they were specifically named in the first information report implicating them as accused, they could not be arrested till 3.5.2002 and 20.5.2002 respectively allegedly on the ground that they had absconded. After they were arrested, test identification parade was conducted where they were identified. Charge-sheet has been filed indicating commission of offences punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the 'IPC'). While the matter stood thus the respondents fi....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e 'Act'). It was further pointed out that one of the accused Sitaram Vetal was not attending the Court regularly and for the last three preceding dates he has not appeared before the Court. 5. Learned counsel for the respondents submitted that the order granting bail was passed long back and merely because certain allegations have been made that does not prove the accused to be guilty as false cases have been foisted because of political rivalry and, therefore, the subsequent cases have no relevance. 6. There is a need to indicate in the order, reasons for prima facie concluding why bail was being granted particularly where an accused was charged of having committed a serious offence. It is necessary for the courts dealing with ap....