<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (8) TMI 776 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457266</link>
    <description>In serious criminal cases, bail must be granted by a reasoned order showing prima facie consideration of the nature and gravity of the accusation, supporting material, the risk of witness interference or intimidation, and the accused&#039;s antecedents. A bail order that omits these relevant factors, ignores recovery, test identification evidence, or criminal history, and relies on an unsupported theory of political rivalry reflects non-application of mind. The grant of bail was therefore unsustainable and was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Sep 2024 11:15:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=767932" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (8) TMI 776 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457266</link>
      <description>In serious criminal cases, bail must be granted by a reasoned order showing prima facie consideration of the nature and gravity of the accusation, supporting material, the risk of witness interference or intimidation, and the accused&#039;s antecedents. A bail order that omits these relevant factors, ignores recovery, test identification evidence, or criminal history, and relies on an unsupported theory of political rivalry reflects non-application of mind. The grant of bail was therefore unsustainable and was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457266</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>