Petition Dismissed by SC Due to 238-Day Delay in Filing; Linked Application Also Disposed Of.Condonation of delay of 238 days in filing the Special Leave Petition - sufficient cause for delay or not - HELD THAT:- There is no satisfactory explanation for condoning the delay of 238 days in filing the Special Leave Petition. The Special Leave Petition is accordingly dismissed on the ground of delay.... ... ... The Supreme Court dismissed the Special Leave Petition due to a delay of 238 days in filing it. Pending application also disposed of.

Citation: TMI
Judges: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abhay S. Oka and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Augustine George Masih
Petitioner represented by: Mr. H R Rao, Mr. Gurmeet Singh Makker, Mr. Shivank Pratap Singh, Ms. Neelakshi Bhadauria, Mr. Sachin Sharma Condonation of delay of 238 days in filing the Special Leave Petition - sufficient cause for delay or not - HELD THAT:- There is no satisfactory explanation for condoning the delay of 238 days in filing the Special Leave Petition. The Special Leave Petition is accordingly dismissed on the ground of delay. COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS, NEW DELHI Versus NATHAN NARAYAN SAMY
Customs
2024 (9) TMI 574 - SC Order - TMI
SUPREME COURT - SC
Dated:- 6-9-2024
SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) Diary No(s). 35627/2024 - -
Customs
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY S. OKA And HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH For the Petitioner : Mr. H R Rao, Adv. Mr. Gurmeet Singh Makker, AOR Mr. Shivank Pratap Singh, Adv. Ms. Neelakshi Bhadauria, Adv. Mr. Sachin Sharma, Adv ORDER UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following. There is no satisfactory explanation for condoning the delay of 238 days in filing the Special Leave Petition. The Special Leave Petition is accordingly dismissed on the ground of delay. Pending application also stands disposed of.
Case laws, Decisions, Judgements, Orders