TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Petition Dismissed by SC Due to 238-Day Delay in Filing; Linked Application Also Disposed Of.</h1> The SC dismissed the Special Leave Petition due to a delay of 238 days in filing. Consequently, the pending application was also disposed of. - TMI Condonation of delay of 238 days in filing the Special Leave Petition - sufficient cause for delay or not - HELD THAT:- There is no satisfactory explanation for condoning the delay of 238 days in filing the Special Leave Petition. The Special Leave Petition is accordingly dismissed on the ground of delay. There is 'no satisfactory explanation for condoning the delay of 238 days in filing the Special Leave Petition.' The Court held that, on that basis, 'The Special Leave Petition is accordingly dismissed on the ground of delay.' The decision disposes of the pending application as well. The ruling rests solely on procedural grounds - inordinate delay and absence of sufficient justification to invoke the Court's discretionary power to condone such delay - rather than on the merits of the underlying controversy. The effect is termination of the Special Leave remedy in this matter for procedural non-compliance, with no adjudication of substantive issues presented in the petition.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
