TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2020 (3) TMI 1477
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....audhary, PS Shalimar Bagh. Mr. Siddharth S. Yadav, Advocate for complainant. JUDGMENT BRIJESH SETHI, J (ORAL) 1. Vide this order, I shall dispose of a bail application filed under section 438 Cr.P.C on behalf of the petitioner Bikramjit Singh in FIR No. 463/2019 u/s. 376/506 IPC, PS Shalimar Bagh. 2. Ld. Counsel for the petitioner has prayed for bail on the ground that petitioner is innocent ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....r-course at BB-58-C, Shalimar Bagh. At that time petitioner was in Dehradun which stands proved from the CDR of the petitioner. 4. It is submitted that the petitioner is a disabled person and suffers from 61% disability and his one leg is short due to which he is unable to move properly. He is chronic heart patient and suffering from various old age ailments. It is submitted that petitioner is re....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....oner Bikaramjeet, who was running a business of fruits and vegetables at Azadpur, Fruit Mandi, Delhi. She alleged that she was working as house maid at H. No. BB-58C, Shalimar Bagh, Delhi, in the house of the petitioner since May 2018. In the first week of the month of June 2018, the petitioner Bikramjeet gave a cold drink to the complainant and thereafter she became unconscious and when she regai....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... alleged period from May, 2018 to 19.08.2019 and more particularly, on 19.08.2019 when the prosecutrix alleged the last incident of inter-course at BB-58-C, Shalimar Bagh. At that time, the petitioner was in Dehradun which has been proved from the CDR of the petitioner. I have considered the contention of Ld. counsel for the petitioner. The authenticity of the CDR can only be judged at the appropr....