https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457076 Anticipatory bail was declined where allegations of rape, blackmail and repeated sexual assault were treated as grave, supported by the victim's statement under section 164 CrPC and claims that the incident was videographed and threats were issued. The defence reliance on call detail records was not accepted at the bail stage because their authenticity and evidentiary value could not be examined minutely in such proceedings. On that basis, the court found that anticipatory bail was not made out and rejected the application. en-us Thu, 05 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 04 Sep 2024 20:04:24 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457076 Anticipatory bail was declined where allegations of rape, blackmail and repeated sexual assault were treated as grave, supported by the victim's statement under section 164 CrPC and claims that the incident was videographed and threats were issued. The defence reliance on call detail records was not accepted at the bail stage because their authenticity and evidentiary value could not be examined minutely in such proceedings. On that basis, the court found that anticipatory bail was not made out and rejected the application. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 05 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457076