2019 (7) TMI 2035

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Spl. Counsel for ED. JUDGMENT (ORAL) CRL.M.A.21909/2024 (under Section 482 Cr.P.C on behalf of the petitioner seeking Recall of the Judgment dated 19.07.2024 passed in W.P.(Crl.) No.384/2019) CRL.M.A.21908/2024 (under Section 482 Cr.P.C on behalf of the petitioner seeking Recall of the Judgment dated 19.07.2024 passed in W.P.(Crl.) No.2353/2019) 1. The applications have been filed on behalf the petitioner for recall of the judgment dated 19.07.2024 passed in Writ Petition No. 384/2019. 2. It is submitted that the aforementioned petition has been dismissed without dealing with any of the grounds raised by the petitioner and without dealing with the submissions made in the written submissions which were placed on record. Several grou....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... being a witness to the accused. It is erroneous in so much as the petitioner was never arrested in PMLA case and has always continued to be a witness therein. In the said paragraph while the first four lines were in respect of PMLA, the subsequent lines were in respect of the proceedings undertaken by the CBI. The last lines are hereby clarified to read as under : "He was subsequently arrested in a CBI case, wherein his status became that of an accused." 8. Similarly, in paragraph 45, the last four words "arrayed as an accused" is corrected to read as "arrayed as a witness". 9. In paragraph 54, it is hereby clarified that the third line which reads as "however, he has later been arrayed as an accused and Loc has been issued against him....