https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456630 The HC addressed the petitioner's applications to recall the judgment in Writ Petition No. 384/2019, correcting typographical errors and clarifying the petitioner's status as a witness, not an accused, in the PMLA case. The Court deleted incorrect observations and extended interim protection for two weeks, allowing the petitioner to challenge other reliefs in the appropriate forum. The applications for recall were disposed of, with the relief deemed satisfied by the SC's decision on the constitutional validity of Section 50 of the PMLA. en-us Tue, 30 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 06 Aug 2024 20:13:16 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456630 The HC addressed the petitioner's applications to recall the judgment in Writ Petition No. 384/2019, correcting typographical errors and clarifying the petitioner's status as a witness, not an accused, in the PMLA case. The Court deleted incorrect observations and extended interim protection for two weeks, allowing the petitioner to challenge other reliefs in the appropriate forum. The applications for recall were disposed of, with the relief deemed satisfied by the SC's decision on the constitutional validity of Section 50 of the PMLA. Case-Laws Money Laundering Tue, 30 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456630