Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2024 (6) TMI 480

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....r>HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ BHANDARI AND HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SHUBHA MEHTA For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vedant Agarwal with Mr. Mayank Taparia through VC For the Respondent(s) : Mr. Bharat Vyas, AAG with Ms. Niti Jain Bhandari Mr. Kinshuk Jain ORDER 1. Petitioner has preferred this writ petition against the order dated 29.09.2023, with a limited prayer that opportunity of heari....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... he did not appear on 27.09.2023, hence, the order was passed on 29.09.2023. It is also contended that it is not mandatory that in all matters, three adjournments have to be given. 4. We have considered the contentions. 5. A limited prayer made before the Court is for quashing of the order dated 29.09.2023 and for affording opportunity of personal hearing to the petitioner. From perusal of t....