<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (6) TMI 480 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753873</link>
    <description>The SC allowed the writ petition, finding that the tax authority failed to provide adequate hearing opportunity as mandated under Section 75(5) of the CGST Act. The impugned order was quashed, with directions to re-adjudicate the matter, offering a final personal hearing and issuing a fresh speaking order in compliance with legal requirements.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 May 2025 12:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=756125" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (6) TMI 480 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753873</link>
      <description>The SC allowed the writ petition, finding that the tax authority failed to provide adequate hearing opportunity as mandated under Section 75(5) of the CGST Act. The impugned order was quashed, with directions to re-adjudicate the matter, offering a final personal hearing and issuing a fresh speaking order in compliance with legal requirements.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753873</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>