SC Upholds HC Decision, Waives Rs.1,00,000 Cost on Petitioner; Dismisses Appeals and Pending Applications.Seeking mandamus against respondents to take legal action against financial institutions for favoring illegal group of companies - It was held by High Court that The petitioner s attempt to withdraw the petition was denied, and costs of Rs. 1 Lakh were imposed to be deposited within two weeks with the Delhi State Legal Services Authority - HELD THAT:- It is not required to interfere with the impugned judgment passed by the High Court. Special Leave Petitions are dismissed. However cost of Rs.1,0... ... ... Issues involved: Dismissal of Special Leave Petitions by the Supreme Court and waiver of imposed costs.

Dismissal of Special Leave Petitions: The Supreme Court, comprising HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. ABDUL NAZEER AND HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.K. MAHESHWARI, declined to interfere with the impugned judgment of the High Court. The Court dismissed the Special Leave Petitions filed by the petitioner.

Waiver of Imposed Costs: Despite upholding the High Court's decision, the Supreme Court decided to waive the cost of Rs.1,00,000/- that was imposed on the petitioner by the High Court in its impugned order. The Court granted this relief to the petitioner.

Disposition of Pending Applications: Additionally, the Supreme Court mentioned that any pending applications related to the case are also disposed of as a part of this judgment. Seeking mandamus against respondents to take legal action against financial institutions for favoring illegal group of companies - It was held by High Court that The petitioner s attempt to withdraw the petition was denied, and costs of Rs. 1 Lakh were imposed to be deposited within two weeks with the Delhi State Legal Services Authority - HELD THAT:- It is not required to interfere with the impugned judgment passed by the High Court. Special Leave Petitions are dismissed. However cost of Rs.1,00,000/- imposed on the petitioner, by the High Court vide its impugned order, is hereby waived. ANKUR GUPTA Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS
Money Laundering
2022 (8) TMI 1514 - SC Order - TMI
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA - SC
Dated:- 8-8-2022
Special Leave to Appeal (Crl. ) No(s). 5179-5180/2022 - -
PMLA
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. ABDUL NAZEER AND HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.K. MAHESHWARI For the Petitioner : Mr. Salman Khursheed, Sr. Adv. Mr. M.S. Khan, Adv. Md. Parvez Dabas, Adv. Mr. Uzmi Jameel Husain, Adv. Ms. Soummya Chaturvedi, Adv. Mr. Mariya Mansuri, Adv. Ms. Affifa Atiq, Adv. Mr. Syed Mehdi Imam, AOR For the Respondent : Mr. C. Aryama Sundaram, Sr. Adv. Mr. Amit Singh Chaddha, Sr. Adv. Mr. Gaurav Agrawal, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following ORDER We are not inclined to interfere with the impugned judgment passed by the High Court. Special Leave Petitions are dismissed. However cost of Rs.1,00,000/- imposed on the petitioner, by the High Court vide its impugned order, is hereby waived. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.
Case laws, Decisions, Judgements, Orders