2024 (1) TMI 1286

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....pondent : Mr. K M Natraj, A.S.G., Dr. Reeta Vasishta, Adv., Mr. Anuj Srinivas Udupa, Adv., Mr. Chitvan Singhal, Adv., Mr. Kritagya Kumar Kait, Adv., Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, AOR ORDER Heard Ms. Nitya Ramakrishnan, learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner. The respondents are represented by Mr. K.M. Natraj, learned Additional Solicitor General of India. 2. The petitioner is an accused....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ssible in law, cannot justify further detention without the benefit of bail for the petitioner. 4. The learned Senior Counsel further submits that SUFA is not amongst the list of banned Terrorist Organisations under Schedule 1 of the UAPA Act and, therefore, being associated with such an organisation and with their members would not itself attract the connection of the accused with the crime alle....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....d against the petitioner, the learned ASG would refer to the chargesheet in the RC18/22/NIA/DLI to argue that the petitioner is closely connected with such people whose roles are covered under the provisions of UAPA Act. The counsel would then refer to Section 43D(5) to argue that unless the Court is able to reasonably believe that the acquisition against the petitioner are prima-facie untrue, the....