https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314135 Bail under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act was tested against the restrictive proviso to Section 43D(5), which permits release only where there are reasonable grounds to believe the accusation is prima facie not true. Applying the standard stated in Watali and reaffirmed in Vernon, the Court considered the chargesheet and the accused's criminal antecedents in a similar matter and found that the threshold for bail was not satisfied. Bail was refused and the special leave petition was dismissed. en-us Thu, 18 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 19 May 2024 08:09:40 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314135 Bail under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act was tested against the restrictive proviso to Section 43D(5), which permits release only where there are reasonable grounds to believe the accusation is prima facie not true. Applying the standard stated in Watali and reaffirmed in Vernon, the Court considered the chargesheet and the accused's criminal antecedents in a similar matter and found that the threshold for bail was not satisfied. Bail was refused and the special leave petition was dismissed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 18 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314135