2024 (3) TMI 83
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....te Dr. Sujay Kantawala a/w Adv Avinash Limbola, Mahdeo Landhe for the respondent ORDER This is an application by the prosecution for cancellation of bail granted to the applicant / accused vide order dated 21.11.2023 passed by the ld Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, 19th Court, Esplanade, Mumbai. 2. The application is opposed by the respondent / accused by reply vide Exh.3. 3. Heard the ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ased the respondent on bail without taking into account the facts and circumstances of the entire case. It is also contended that no reasonable time has been granted for fair investigation and it has hamper the investigation. It is further contention of the applicant that the accused has directed to attend the office of prosecution agency between 11.00 a.m. to 4.00 p.m. and it is likely that there....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
..... During the course of argument, it was specifically asked what kind of co-operation is expected from the accused to which it was replied that the accused is not providing certain documents related to RTO registration of the cranes. The advocate for the accused at that time made submission that he is ready to provide documents required for the investigation and therefore, the case was adjourned fo....