<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (3) TMI 83 - THE COURT OF SESSION FOR GREATER BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450302</link>
    <description>The application for cancellation of bail granted to the accused under the Customs Act, 1962, was rejected by the court. The prosecution argued that the bail was improperly granted and that the accused might influence witnesses. However, the court found the accused had cooperated with the investigation, complied with bail conditions, and determined there was no justification for revocation. The application was thus dismissed, and the bail remained in effect.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Mar 2024 07:23:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=745485" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (3) TMI 83 - THE COURT OF SESSION FOR GREATER BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450302</link>
      <description>The application for cancellation of bail granted to the accused under the Customs Act, 1962, was rejected by the court. The prosecution argued that the bail was improperly granted and that the accused might influence witnesses. However, the court found the accused had cooperated with the investigation, complied with bail conditions, and determined there was no justification for revocation. The application was thus dismissed, and the bail remained in effect.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450302</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>