Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1980 (3) TMI 21

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ion of these shares. The WTO determined the break-up value of these shares at Rs. 1,611 per share on the basis of the balance-sheet of the company as at 31st December, 1960. The material valuation date was 8th November, 1961, the relevant assessment year in question being 1962-63. The break-up value was arrived at by taking the total of the paid up capital, reserves and surplus and dividing it by 3,471 which was the number of the equity shares of the company. In appeal before the AAC, two contentions were raised on behalf of the assessee. It was contended that while determining the break-up value of the shares of the company, a deduction should have been given on account of additional super-tax which would be payable by the company as a ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....., and the liability for bonus not provided for in the accounts should be deducted in computing the break-up value of the shares of the company for the purposes of the wealth-tax assessment of the assessee for the assessment year, 1962-63 ?" Mr. Pandit, appearing on behalf of the assessee, has fairly drawn our attention to the decision of this court in CWT v. S. K. Varma [1978] 113 ITR 882, in which this court has taken the view that in the wealth-tax assessment of an assessee who holds shares in a company, the WTO adopting the break-up method would be justified in considering that the provision for additional super-tax under s. 104 of the I.T. Act, 1961, made by the company was not allowable as a deduction where the order determining th....