Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) whether provision for additional super-tax under section 104 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, could be deducted while computing the break-up value of the shares for wealth-tax purposes; and (ii) whether liability for bonus payable under the employee agreement, though not provided in the balance-sheet, was deductible in computing the break-up value.
Issue (i): whether provision for additional super-tax under section 104 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, could be deducted while computing the break-up value of the shares for wealth-tax purposes.
Analysis: Liability for additional super-tax under section 104 does not arise automatically by operation of law. It arises only when an order determining the company's liability is made by the Income-tax Officer. Therefore, unless such an order exists before the material valuation date, the provision shown in the balance-sheet cannot be treated as a deductible liability in valuing the shares under the break-up method.
Conclusion: The provision for additional super-tax was not deductible in computing the break-up value of the shares, in favour of the Revenue.
Issue (ii): whether liability for bonus payable under the employee agreement, though not provided in the balance-sheet, was deductible in computing the break-up value.
Analysis: The bonus liability arose under an existing agreement governing payment to employees, and the obligation had accrued to the company. The omission to make a book provision in the balance-sheet did not alter the existence of the liability. Such accrued liability had to be taken into account in determining the break-up value.
Conclusion: The liability for bonus was deductible in computing the break-up value, in favour of the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The reference was answered partly for the Revenue and partly for the assessee, with deduction denied for the super-tax provision but allowed for the bonus liability.
Ratio Decidendi: For wealth-tax valuation of unquoted shares under the break-up method, only liabilities that have accrued or crystallised by the valuation date are deductible; a provision for additional super-tax under section 104 is not deductible unless the liability has been determined by a prior order, while an accrued contractual bonus liability remains deductible even if not separately provided in the accounts.