Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the proportionate provision made for purchase tax liability by a partner in computing net wealth under the Wealth-tax Act was deductible as a debt owed on the valuation date.
Analysis: The liability for purchase tax was treated as arising when the purchases were effected, and the provision made against that liability was held to be an existing and accrued liability. Net wealth under section 2(m) of the Wealth-tax Act excludes only what is not a debt owed on the valuation date. The reasoning applied the settled distinction between a contingent liability and a perfected debt, and treated the purchase tax provision as a liability in praesenti. On that basis, the proportionate share of the provision in the hands of the partners was held deductible in computing net wealth.
Conclusion: The proportionate provision for purchase tax was a debt owed and was deductible in computing the partners' net wealth.