2019 (8) TMI 1894

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....L) Crl.M.A.4488/2016 (delay) For the reasons stated in the application and because the petitioner was pursuing a wrong remedy of filing the appeal before the learned Additional Sessions Judge which was dismissed vide order dated 22nd January, 2016, the delay in filing the leave to appeal petition is condoned. CRL.L.P. 172/2016 1. Aggrieved by the order dated 19th November 2015, passed ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....- without interest to him and she promised to return the same within a period of six months. It was mutually agreed that in case the said amount of Rs.3,50,000/- is repaid by the respondent within 6 months that is on 5th June 2013 then no interest will be charged by the petitioner but in case the respondent fails to repay the said amount on or before 5th June 2013 then interest will be charged by ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Legal notice dated 23rd December 2013 was sent to respondent through speed post on 24th December 2013, however, despite notice, respondent failed to make the payment within the stipulated period of time, hence, the complaint filed by the petitioner. 6. In the pre-summoning evidence, the petitioner tendered his evidence by way of an affidavit vide Ex. CW-1/A and exhibited the relied upon docum....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....was fixed for 23rd July 2015. On 23rd July, 2015 none appeared before the learned Metropolitan Magistrate at Rohini District Court as the advocates were on strike. On 19th November 2015, the complaint was dismissed on account of non-appearance on behalf of the petitioner. 8. Considering the explanation rendered by the petitioner that on 23rd July, 2015 because of the strike of the lawyers neith....