https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311503 The court condoned the delay in filing the leave to appeal petition, allowing the petitioner to proceed with the appeal after initially pursuing the wrong remedy. The petitioner's complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, was dismissed for non-appearance, leading to the respondent's acquittal. Upon reviewing the petitioner's explanation for non-appearance, the court granted leave to appeal and restored the complaint to its original position. This restoration was contingent upon the petitioner paying costs to the respondent, and a new date was set for further proceedings. en-us Wed, 07 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 30 Dec 2023 08:30:48 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311503 The court condoned the delay in filing the leave to appeal petition, allowing the petitioner to proceed with the appeal after initially pursuing the wrong remedy. The petitioner's complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, was dismissed for non-appearance, leading to the respondent's acquittal. Upon reviewing the petitioner's explanation for non-appearance, the court granted leave to appeal and restored the complaint to its original position. This restoration was contingent upon the petitioner paying costs to the respondent, and a new date was set for further proceedings. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 07 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311503