2008 (10) TMI 232

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ate, for the Respondent. [Order per : Adarsh Kumar Goel, J. (Oral)]. - The Revenue has preferred this appeal under Section 35(G) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 (for short the Act) against the order Annexure P-2 dated 20-6-2007 passed by the Customs Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi, proposing to raise following substantial questions : "(i) Whether CESTAT's Order setting asi....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....r day which was more than the amount of tax and thus beyond maximum penalty leviable. The Revisional Authority reduced the amount of penalty to Rs. 10,167/- for delay of 129 days which was equal to 100% of the service tax. 3. The Revenue approached the Tribunal. The Tribunal following the judgment of Karnataka High Court in CCE Bangalore v. Sunitha Shetty - 2006 (3) S.T.R. 404 (Kar.) = 2004 (17....